Space Sidhe

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
cleolinda
chipbutbetter

fun fact (not fun at all fact actually) :

aromanticism and asexuality are still treated as issues to be fixed in most therapy settings, at least in the western psychiatric institution. i cannot fucking mention my aromanticism or asexuality to a therapist or it’ll immediately become their primary concern and goal to fix. whether or not i have a partner/am trying to have a partner is actively being used as an indicator of my wellness, regardless of if i WANT one. i cannot have access to needed mental health ressources because of fear of conversion therapy. aro and/or ace conversion therapy is the norm in most psychiatric institutions and we are getting told by the rest of the queer community that our oppression isnt real and that there is no link between our struggles and theirs.

acesnyc

Unfortunately, this is the reality for many ace and aro people.

Although the websites aren't very extensive, Aro Recommended and Ace Recommended are two sites where you can find mental health professionals who are aromantic- and asexual-friendly.

The sites also have other ace- and aro-friendly professionals listed, such as medical doctors, religious leaders, and aro-owned businesses.

If you're aware of any professionals (especially doctors and therapists) who are ace- and/or aro-friendly, please feel free to submit recommendations! The recommendation forms can be found on the sites themselves.

asexual aromantic queer
sindri42
mrsterlingeverything

Let me make one thing extremely fucking clear

image
sindri42

I'm sorry to say historical accounts are not anywhere near this clear.

A flail is initially derived from a farming implement for separating grain; the first examples were simply two lengths of wood with a rope between them, later developments replaced the striking piece with a metal weight and often replaced the wood with a few links of chain, variations include some with multiple striking objects each on a separate rope/chain, some with the flexible connector extended to great length while others it's almost just a joint, etc. The striking head is usually, but not always, blunt.

A mace is a single solid shaft, with a striking weight one one end. Usually the shaft is wood and the head is metal, but the shaft might be metal and the head might be stone. The head can be practically any shape, from just a continuation of the cylinder in a heavier material, to a solid ball or block, to flanged, to spiked.

A morningstar has a spiked ball for a head, but that's the only consistent thing about it. Some put that round spiked head on the end of a wooden haft, and so also fit the definition of mace. Others put it on a length of chain, and thus also fit the definition of flail.

They exist on a spectrum of weapon design and linguistics where distinctions are never clear cut. Like trying to tell the difference between a partisan and a spontoon, or a glaive from a fauchard.

to be more pendantic this person has it flail as pictured is strongly debated if it was a thing that EVER saw any military use it appeared in a very few illustrations and fewer physical objects which may have been produced more as items of interest than as functional weapons sword nerd sword geek flail mace morning star
chezamanda
penandinkprincess

i do not at all mean this in a perjorative manner, but i do think it’s important to be able to consume a piece of media and go, “i’m not the audience for this” and be able to just walk away 

there doesn’t have to be something wrong or “problematic” about something for a person to not like it. personal taste is personal taste. but something not doing it for you doesn’t mean it automatically has to be wrong or bad. it’s just not for you. 

sindri42

There’s been several times when I’ve watched a thing and been like, they clearly did what they intended to do, and did it well, and I don’t want any part of it. This is a high quality and deeply unpleasant piece of art.

queenclaudiabrown

“This is a high quality and deeply unpleasant piece of art” is a wonderful line, I love it, I feel it in my soul

saxifraga-x-urbium

image

too good a take to be left in the tags

obstinaterixatrix

Recently, my son said to me after seeing a ballet on television: “It’s beautiful but I don’t like it.” And I thought, Are many grown-ups capable of such a distinction? It’s beautiful, but I don’t like it. Usually, our grown-up thinking is more along the lines of: I don’t like it, so it’s not beautiful. What would it meant to separate those two impressions for art making and for art criticism?

- Sarah Ruhl, 100 Essays I Don’t Have Time To Write

not everything is for you and that's fine you don't have to write a whole thesis on why it's Bad TM you can just not like a thing? or just not have any strong feelings either way and that is perfectly okay fandom discussion